Re: [boost] [Bug][Tools] Incomplete tool documentation, especially for building

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 09:34:06

Daryle Walker wrote:

> In fact the QuickBook and Wave tools have the same problem.
> (The source for both is C++-based and in different
> subdirectories in the "tools" directory, but the docs never
> tell you that!)  The other tools (build, regression, inspect,
> and BoostBook) do have building directions, but they're
> either indirectly linked or plainly presented.

I'll take care of the mentioned Wave related things.

> The Wave-tool docs have a different additional problem in
> that it's mixed in the Wave-library docs.  The traversal
> symbols on that page shouldn't be followed since they can't
> help with the tool (just with Wave-library).  The page isn't
> next to the Wave-tool source code, either.

Yeah. That's for historical reasons... I have not thought about the need to
have separate docs yet, but I'll try to separate them.

Regards Hartmut