From: Jose (jmalv04_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-17 10:19:53
Sorry, I forgot to mention that your query was 6 seconds on my x86_64 3Gb
I didn't want to compare any results yet because geographical queries really
auxiliary coding, e.g. like building a cities worldmap before actually
running the queries.
So once I have your updated code I will run both on identical setting.
Calum's is the code author so I am sure he'll post that but I propose the
solutions are coded separately so that the best ideas come up and then after
the benchmark the code is distributed for further analysis, otherwise we
have some bias in the benchmark. I just wanted to bring up the worldmap
optimization so that the relational benchmarks can be compared on equal
I will email you directly some of my own optimization ideas as I have not
yet looked in detail at calum's code
On 10/17/05, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Jose" <jmalv04_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > I've got the RML example for the new query and it is in the miliseconds
> > range.
> Would it be possible for you to also run the RTL example on your setup? It
> will not be in milliseconds range, but we would have a more accurate
> starting point to compare.
> Also, is it possible to see what the RML solution looks like?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk