Re: [boost] [ongoing review of binary_int] reviewers for small utility wanted

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-21 08:07:58

"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:

> boost-bounces_at_[hidden]  wrote:
>
>> > Matt Calabrese's version is in
>> > http://www.illegal-immigration.com/Riv/boost/binary_literal2.hpp.
>> > It can be used as:
>> > int x = BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL( 101 0111 1010 0110 );
>> 
>> This version looks better to me. 

I'm also more inclined towards the macro version (with Paul's
suggested name change), although if we got some of the MPL
interoperability things that Andy Little mentioned, and of course the
absolutely _essential_ documentation, I might be inclined the other
way.

> BTW, is there any reason why we couldn't go with just
> 'BOOST_BINARY'?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com