From: Oliver Kullmann (O.Kullmann_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-21 11:32:29
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:12:05PM +0100, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> Oliver Kullmann wrote:
> > 220.127.116.11.2 from the C++ standard invokes scanf from the C library,
> > which then according to 18.104.22.168 from the C standard, clause 10,
> > yields undefined behaviour if the number represented in the stream is not
> which version of C standard is in your mind?
I have the C99 standard (as a book), while the C90 standard (I thought
it would be C89?) seems to cost a fortune.
> I believe that C90 that C++
> standard referes to, does not mention UB.
But then it should be the case that the C99 standard only
makes more precise what the older standard left out?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk