Re: [boost] [ongoing review of binary_int] reviewers for small utility wanted

From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn-boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-22 04:12:19

Alexander Nasonov <alnsn-boost <at> yandex.ru> writes:
> Pavel Vozenilek <pavel_vozenilek <at> hotmail.com> writes:
> > Matt Calabrese's version is in 
> > http://www.illegal-immigration.com/Riv/boost/binary_literal2.hpp.
> > It can be used as:
> > int x = BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL( 101 0111 1010 0110 );
> 
> This version looks better to me. There is no contradiction with 2.13.1/2 
rules.
> I don't like BOOST_SUFFIXED_BINARY_LITERAL much, though. Is it possible to get
> rid of it and to use BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL( 0000 0110U ) instead?

Sorry for not being clear about Matt Calabrese's version. I vote to accept it 
into boost.
--
Alexander Nasonov