Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-31 11:51:30

Cromwell Enage <sponage_at_[hidden]> writes:

> --- Daryle Walker wrote:
>> re-statement of the rational number itself?
> No.
>> Or is it supposed to be the remainder after taking
>> out the "whole" part?
> Yes.
>> If the latter, then the name should have
>> replacing the first "RATIONAL", since "fractional"
>> and not "rational" better describes a left-over bit.
> For consistency this part of the macro name is
> lexically the same as the template name whose
> specialization the macro creates, i.e. rational_part.

Both names seems misleading to me. What's wrong with



Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at