Re: [boost] Proposal: XML APIs in boost

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-01 14:45:21

> The implementation I propose deals with unicode perfectly fine (storing
> utf-8 internally),

What if I prefer UCS4 or plain 8 bit?

> but as far as the C++ XML API is concerned I delegate
> unicode access to a template parameter and associated traits that can be

So now it's traits template parameter (which in itself isn't exactly 
corect - you probably meant policy). Yes - under generic Policy template 
parameter you could hide almost anything. But policy is much more that just 
a string type. And then I would be interested in concept this policy 
represent.

Gennadiy