From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-01 16:05:01
"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Cory Nelson wrote:
>>I saw that presentation too, it is very impressive and I can't wait to
>>see what comes of it.
> Yeah, having active and futures support would make writing multithreaded
> apps a dream.
>>I would love to see something like this go into boost but somehow I
>>don't think it could be done elegantly without language and compiler
>>support. Definitely wouldn't complain if someone proved me wrong :)
> Active objects would be very hard to do *automatically* since the object is
> a thread (very neat concept)
Also a very old concept. See Simula. Kristen Nygaard would be
However, it sounds a lot like the COM "apartment model," which I've
never had the pleasure to use, but whose usability I recall my
colleagues complaining bitterly about.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk