From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-02 15:12:03
On 11/2/05, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd personally prefer using the member function pointer as an explicit
> template argument, allowing for the calling syntax:
> enqueue< &your_type::member_function >( your, arguments, go, here );
> Again, with proper forms having different amounts of parameters generated
> by Boost.Preprocessor.
Heh, scratch that, unless someone can actually come up with a way to provide
that syntax in a manner which works for all types.
-- -Matt Calabrese
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk