From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-05 07:39:47
pongba <pongba_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Eric Niebler <eric <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> Incrementing the 'BOOST_MPL_..._LIMIT_ARITY'(I forgot the detail though)
> doesn't help though, because the arity of mpl::apply will increase
> correspondingly and will always be one more arity than that mpl::lambda can
> support! It's inherent conflict or inconsistence.
> Did I miss any obvious alternative?;-)
Eric can use the appropriate applyN template.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk