|
Boost : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-05 11:39:17
The following short program works fine for VC7.1, but for several well
regarded compilers including Intel-8/9 and gcc-3.4 fails to compile due to
"ambiguous overload" errors. It's causing errors in the TR1/Bind concept
tests, and I'd like to figure out if it's the compiler or Boost.Bind that's
at fault so I can file defect reports with the compiler vendors if
necessary.
Here's the test case:
#include <boost/bind.hpp>
template <class Functor>
void consume(Functor f);
double test_proc(int a, char b, long c)
{
return a+b+c;
}
struct from_double
{
from_double(double){}
};
int main()
{
consume(boost::bind<double>(&test_proc, 0, 0, 0));
consume(boost::bind<float>(&test_proc, 0, 0, 0));
consume(boost::bind<long double>(&test_proc, 0, 0, 0));
consume(boost::bind<from_double>(&test_proc, 0, 0, 0));
}
And a typical error message from Intel-9 is:
$ icl -GX -c -Ic:\\data\\boost\\develop\\boost bind.cpp
Intel(R) C++ Compiler for 32-bit applications, Version 9.0 Build
20050912Z Pa
ckage ID: W_CC_C_9.0.024
Copyright (C) 1985-2005 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
30 DAY EVALUATION LICENSE
bind.cpp
bind.cpp(21): error: more than one instance of overloaded function
"boost::bind"
matches the argument list:
function template "boost::bind<R,F,A1,A2,A3>(F, A1, A2, A3)"
function template "boost::bind(R (*)(B1, B2, B3), A1, A2, A3)"
argument types are: (double (*)(int, char, long), int, int, int)
consume(boost::bind<double>(&test_proc, 0, 0, 0));
^
compilation aborted for bind.cpp (code 2)
Note that it's the presence of the function pointer overloads that causes
the error: in other words it's an artefact of the implementation that causes
the error, not the TR1 specification itself.
Anyone any ideas whose at fault here?
Thanks,
John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk