Re: [boost] Proposal: XML APIs in boost

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-05 17:19:39

Reece Dunn wrote:

> This would make it easier to support push_back( cdata( "foo<bar>" )), 
> etc. without having _comment, _cdata, etc. variants for each insertion 
> function.

Are you seriously suggesting all this overhead just for having a single
name being overloaded ? It isn't even less typing for users, so what gain
does this provide ?

Regards,
                Stefan