From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-07 05:22:25
> I actually consider this to be a vital usability feature. It would be
> an unpleasant surprise if it's not going to make it into comforming
> TR1 implementations. Or did I misunderstand your earlier comment?
I don't know if it's possible to support this, and to support the
named-return-type syntax as well. I also don't see anything in the TR1 text
that requires this to be supported... Peter?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk