Re: [boost] [Bind] TR1 and overload ambiguity.

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-07 05:22:25

> I actually consider this to be a vital usability feature. It would be
> an unpleasant surprise if it's not going to make it into comforming
> TR1 implementations. Or did I misunderstand your earlier comment?

I don't know if it's possible to support this, and to support the 
named-return-type syntax as well.  I also don't see anything in the TR1 text 
that requires this to be supported... Peter?

John.