From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-07 13:32:41
>>God, I hope not. The only reason this component exists is because some
>>people here on the list, who were familiar with original testing library
>>wanted something for backward compatibility. In fact for the new users I
>>don't see almost any reasons to use it at all. Boost.Test provides better
> Quoting from the introduction to the documentation section for the
> Minimal Testing facility:
> Minimal testing facility does not require linking with external
> so could be a component of choice for simple and quick testing needs.
> Perhaps something more akin to your message above should be in this
> introduction. Note that one of my co-workers also went down this
Ok. I will add some discouraging message.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk