Re: [boost] [Review] The review of the Boost.Logging library startstoday, November 7th

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-10 10:30:58

Paul A Bristow wrote:
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Hartmut Kaiser
> | Sent: 06 November 2005 20:02
> | To: boost_at_[hidden]
> | Subject: [boost] [Review] The review of the Boost.Logging 
> | 
> | Please always state in your review, whether you think the library should
> be
> | accepted as a Boost library!
> 
> Yes - definitely.  I think Boost badly needs a logging system and this is a

Thanks!

> 
> I'd very much like to see an optional interface with the Boost date-time
> library.

It's on my TODO list ;)
> 
> | - What is your evaluation of the documentation?
> Looks reasonable, but needs refinement in the light of user experience.
> Layout is plain and simple and fine for me (I doubt the work involved in
> producing fancier versions is worth it).
> I may be willing to assist with 'editorial' work on it.

Super! I'll call you on that :)

Thanks.

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo,    Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/surfaces.html - Sky's the limit!
-- http://www.torjo.com/cb/ - Click, Build, Run!