Re: [boost] Boost Test - yet more mostly spurious warnings.

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-12 11:53:18

| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental
| Sent: 11 November 2005 18:45
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Test - yet more mostly spurious warnings.
| 
| > # pragma warning(disable: 4127) // conditional expression is constant.
| Is it from lexical_cast?

No I think calculation from numeric_limits - looks entirely expected to me.

| > # pragma warning(disable: 4180) // qualifier applied to 
| function type has 
| > no
| > meaning; ignored
| >
| > at:
| >    const_string message() const  { return !m_message ? 
| const_string() :
| > const_string( m_message->str() ); }
| >
| >                            ^^ const not useful? but not wrong.
| 
| Sorry, where is qualifier?

Is it objecting to the const? 

 const_string message() const

shall I try removing it?

| > # pragma warning(disable: 4224) // nonstandard extension used :
...
| That I will fix.

Thanks

Paul
-- 
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
Phone and SMS text [phone], Mobile and SMS text [phone]
mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden]  www.hetp.u-net.com