From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-20 19:01:42
bwood <brass_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Matthias Troyer wrote:
>>> i) somehow I doubt that this archive type has been tested with all
>>> the serialization test suite. Instructions for doing so are in the
>>> documenation and the serialization/test directory includes batch
>>> files for doing this with one's own archives. Was this done? What
>>> where the results? With which compiler? It costs nothing to do
>>Just ask if you had a doubt. The short answer is "I have done this".
>>After adding the fast array serialization to the binary and
>>polymorphic archives, I ran all your regression tests, without any
>>problem (using gcc 4 under MacOS X).
> Have you done this with vector also? I would be surprised
> if you have.
> It seems to me there is a standards issue to
> be addressed in this area. It is no problem to send the
> data in a vector of int as a unit, but I don't know of a
> way to add/receive the data into a vector correctly. It is
> possible to stuff the data into the correct place, but the
> vector's internal state/size does not get set properly since
> you didn't call push_back or some other method to get the
> data into place. Adding something like push_n_back to vector
> might help when it comes this.
You resize first and then copy the data in. It's a factor of 2 slower
than the ideal, but it's still way faster than doing what the library
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk