|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-21 19:03:41
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> integral_constant<bool,b> derives from mpl::bool_<b> for backwards
> compatibility.
For still more backward compatibility we ought to have a conversion
in the other direction.
> Stupid question but why doesn't your function do:
>
> template <class T>
> typename is_fundamental<T>::type f(T)
> {
> return is_fundamental<T>::type();
> }
Stupid answer: broken compiler workaround.
Anyway, this isn't a big deal. Maybe not even worth acting on.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk