From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-22 11:33:17
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I have one question about this.
> What is the ultimate purpose. That is it just to optimize
> serialization of certains types of collections of bit streamable
> objects? or does have some more ambitious goal.
I thought I highlighted the ultimate purpose quite clearly already:
| For many archive formats and common datatypes there exist APIs
| that can quickly read or write contiguous sequences of those types
| all at once (**). Reading or writing such a sequence by
| separately reading or writing each element (as the serialization
| library currently does) can be an order of magnitude more
We want to be able to capitalize on the existence of those APIs, and
to do that we need a "hook" that will be used whenever a contiguous
sequence is going to be (de)serialized. No such hook exists in
(**) Note that this capability is not necessarily tied to bitwise
serialization or the use of a binary representation.
In particular, I took special pains to clarify above (**) that this is
*not* merely about "serialization of certains types of collections of
bit streamable objects."
If that's unclear, maybe you could ask some specific questions so that
I know what needs to be clarified.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk