From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-24 15:27:48
Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> Creating a "buffered_archive" wouldnt require copying? And as Matthias
> have already put, it is an unacceptable overhead. I'm having some
> ideas about a 'fake_buffered'_archive.
LOL - then then have your archive send the data whereevery you want
it to. The point is that the 10x speed up demonstration on which this whole
rests is based on using the current binary_?archive which (apparently)
won't be the mechanism which will eventually be used.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk