From: dan marsden (danmarsden_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-25 15:26:57
--- Brian Braatz <brianb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> /// Testing remove
> typedef vector<Y, char, long, X, bool,
> double> mpl_vec;
> == tuple<Y, char, long, bool,
> == tuple<char, long, X, bool,
> == tuple<Y, char, X, bool, double>()));
> My question is how does the above WORK?
> What caught my attention is the char,long,bool, and
> double have undefined
> values in them.
The mpl::vector doesn't have any values in it, never
mind undefined ones. (See later)
> Is it that when performing a ==, if one is comparing
> a mpl sequence the
> equality is based solely on TYPE? (is that what is
> going on?)
No thats not correct. Fusion can iterate over an MPL
sequence, even though that sequence does not have
values in it. To do this when a fusion iterator over
an MPL is dereferenced, it returns a default
constructed value of the current element type.
So for example mpl::vector<int,char> can be thought of
as a sequence containing elements int() and char().
So operator == checks the sequences are the same size,
then creates fusion iterators to iterate over the
sequence, and compares all the (default constructed)
Hope that helps.
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk