From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-27 09:03:55
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> If all of that fails I want the rest of the community to understand
>> why we are doing what we're doing so that our work will be accepted,
>> both by users, and -- we hope -- as a separate Boost library.
> You should just make your own "improved" version of the library and
> get it reviewed as a replacement or alternative for the current one.
> Sounds like you've got a couple of competent and interested people
> on board - just do it!
No, we don't want to maintain a whole serialization library. We're
willing, if necessary, to maintain a small library built upon
Boost.Serialization, like what's proposed in
Are you unwilling to discuss the topics I raised in my previous
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk