Re: [boost] [1.33.0] Inspection report nits

From: Bart (bartmann.nsd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-01 20:48:02

"Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:24b520d20512010704w6d06cb08m3991e843077ebf58_at_mail.gmail.com...
> Hello all,
>
> Here is today's inspection report on the RC_1_33_0 branch. Would everyone
> please take a look at these and fix whatever needs to be fixed? The report
> is also available at
>  http://www.boost.org/inspect.html
>
>  Cheers,
>  Doug
>
> Totals
>
> 11276 files scanned
> 856 directories scanned
> 63 problems reported
>
> problem counts:
>  0 files with invalid line endings
>  0 bookmarks with invalid characters
>  0 invalid urls
>  9 broken links
>  26 unlinked files
>  21 file names too long
>  0 files with tabs
>  7 violations of the Boost min/max guidelines
>
> Summary  *Library* *Problems*
...
> date_time<http://www.boost.org/inspect.html#date_time>
...
>
> date_time
>
> boost/date_time/date_parsing.hpp: violation of Boost min/max
> guidelines on line 80, violation of Boost min/max guidelines on line
> 81
> boost/date_time/period.hpp: violation of Boost min/max guidelines on
> line 325, violation of Boost min/max guidelines on line 326

These are not min/max violations.
They are simply occurances of the word "min" or "max" within comments.

> libs/date_time/xmldoc/date_time_docs_howto.html: unlinked file

This particular file isn't supposed to be linked.

>
> doc
>
> doc/html/date_time/doxy.html: broken link:
> ../../../boost/date_time/local_time/local_time_serialize.hpp

I don't know about this one. I don't see it in cvs:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/doc/html/date_time/

Bart