Re: [boost] Boost regression notification (2005-12-04 [RC_1_33_0])

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-04 17:18:16

On Dec 4, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Daryle Walker wrote:

> On 12/4/05 12:14 PM, "Douglas Gregor" <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>> 1015 failures in 56 libraries:
> [most failures are from one compiler; most libraries only have  
> problem with
> that one compiler; said compiler's appearance is a surprise and it'll
> usually go away in the next cycle]
>
>> Rene is looking into these... let's hope it's some kind of simple
>> configuration problem...
>
> Maybe we should add something to a script that if a compiler shows  
> up in
> most tests, especially if it's the sole problem compiler for many  
> tests
> across many libraries.  The message could say that "compiler X by  
> operator Y
> seems to be broken."  (My criteria may be too vague for a computer.)

Yes, this is a good idea. The script that e-mails these reports is  
tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py and should  be  
pretty easy to hack, if you're interested in taking a shot at adding  
this functionality.

        Doug