Boost logo

Boost :

From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-06 18:15:26

>>1) What is currently the major version number appears to have lost all its
>> meaning. Why isn't it dropped, making the next release '34' instead of '1.34' ?
> I agree, the use of the "1." is questionable. However, we could reserve
> 2.x.y for a version of Boost that does not contain any workarounds for
> ancient, non-conforming compilers, or for a similar clean-cut scenario.

I've the same opinion. (The Apache project also used 1.xx for a very
long time; and when they did finally move to 2.xx it was very minor from
the typical user's point of view).


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at