Re: [boost] seeking advice from CodeWarrior experts

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-08 01:50:12

Noel Belcourt wrote:
> 
>>Eric Niebler wrote:
>>
>>>Does cw-9_4 really support partial specialization of class templates?
>>>According to boost.config it does. xpressive's tests are failing on 
>>>this compiler, with heaps of errors like:
>>>
>>>### mwcc Compiler:
>>>#      In:
>>>..\boost\xpressive\detail\static\productions\independent_compiler.hpp
>>>#    From: ..\libs\xpressive\test\misc1.cpp
>>># -----------------------------------------
>>>#     128:       : transform_compiler<arg_transform,
>>>xpressive::detail::seq_tag>
>>>#   Error:       ^
>>>#   illegal partial specialization
>>>
> 
> 
> 1) add the missing default template argument to the compiler 
> specialization
> 
>      template<bool PositiveT>
>      struct compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_tag<PositiveT>, 
> xpressive::detail::seq_tag, void>
>        : branch_compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_branch<PositiveT>, 
> xpressive::detail::ind_tag>
>      {
>      };

Ah, interesting. Thanks for the suggestion -- I've committed the fix. 
Let's see what the next round of regression tests reveal.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com