Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] constructor accepting auto_ptr

From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-08 04:42:20

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Yuval Ronen wrote:
>>Does that mean that on a stricter compiler, when passing a temporary
>>auto_ptr, I *have* to use the '.release()' way, and *can't* get the
>>strong exception guarantee?
> 
> 
> Yes it does, but when your source is a temporary, it doesn't make any 
> difference; even if it's left unchanged by the constructor, it will be 
> destroyed at the end of the full expression, along with the pointee. 

Ok, I see. Thanks.