|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-08 07:13:03
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:
> This is a whole new ball game. Wrapping all Boost code in pragma guard
> has its advantages and disadvantages. I won't argue here in favour or
> against it. All I'm saying that invoking bjam to compile Boost itself,
> shouldn't emit any warnings. This is something that I can't imagine
> anyone saying is wrong.
No disagreement with that. However, you missed this part of the
discussion *before* the release:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/11/96241.php
where arguments like this one apparently won out:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/11/96212.php
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk