Re: [boost] seeking advice from CodeWarrior experts

From: Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-12 17:53:26

On Dec 12, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:

> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) add the missing default template argument to the compiler
>>> specialization
>>>
>>>     template<bool PositiveT>
>>>     struct compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_tag<PositiveT>,
>>> xpressive::detail::seq_tag, void>
>>>       : 
>>> branch_compiler<xpressive::detail::lookahead_branch<PositiveT>,
>>> xpressive::detail::ind_tag>
>>>     {
>>>     };
>>
>> Ah, interesting. Thanks for the suggestion -- I've committed the fix.
>> Let's see what the next round of regression tests reveal.
>
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, Noel. Now, all of xpressive tests are
> compiling successfully on cw-9_4. That's the good news. The bad news is
> they all crash at runtime. :-P This is the (unhelpful) error:
>
> minimal.hpp(122): exception "memory access violation" caught in
> function: 'main(int, char **)'
>
> If someone with cw-9_4 felt like being charitable this holiday season,
> they could run xpressive's "test_static" and/or "test_dynamic" tests
> under a debugger and send me the stack trace. Or grant me ssh access to
> a machine with this toolset so I can debug it myself.
>
I can assist if it's okay to use CW 9.6?

-- Noel