|
Boost : |
From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-13 02:02:30
Hi Oliver,
--- Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] wrote:
<snip>
> sig:action abstracts struct sigaction, clib function ::sigaction
> and so on.
Is sigaction safe with threads? Doesn't it set the process-wide signal
handler? If so, that won't work if a process might be doing writes from
multiple threads.
I've been doing a bit of reading along the lines of what Jeremy
suggested, and it seems like best thing at this stage is:
- On linux use sendmsg with the MSG_NOSIGNAL flag.
- On Mac OS X use setsockopt with SO_NOSIGPIPE option.
- Solaris ... ??? Unfortunately the best option at this stage does seem
to be globally ignoring the signal.
Cheers,
Chris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk