From: Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-14 12:24:44
On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:53 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>> If someone with cw-9_4 felt like being charitable this holiday
>>> they could run xpressive's "test_static" and/or "test_dynamic" tests
>>> under a debugger and send me the stack trace. Or grant me ssh access
>>> a machine with this toolset so I can debug it myself.
>> I can assist if it's okay to use CW 9.6?
> That's a generous offer, and the results will be interesting, but I
> suspect the problem won't expose itself with 9.6, since the test_static
> test passed with cw-9_5 even before my fixes. I'm guessing this is a
> cw-9_4-specific problem, but I can't say for sure at this point.
There is a problem compiling Xpressive's test_static and test_dynamic
with CW 9.6. The error is in test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp, lines
# include <unistd.h>
# include <signal.h>
# include <setjmp.h>
These include files are defined in CW's standard library (MSL) and they
hide the ones in /usr/include. The MSL doesn't seem to define the full
(or maybe the correct) set of signal handling functions and structures.
Xpressive's test_static and test_dynamic compile and run without error
if I change the includes to
# include </usr/include/unistd.h>
# include </usr/include/signal.h>
# include </usr/include/setjmp.h>
Can anyone suggest a workaround for this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk