Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Logging: formal review

From: Richard Glanmark (Richard.Glanmark_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-15 10:02:11

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Martin Bonner
> Sent: den 15 december 2005 15:15
> To: 'boost_at_[hidden]'
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Logging: formal review
>
> The current definition is (I believe)
>
> #define BOOST_LOG(logger) \
> 	if(!logger.isEnabled()) {} else logger
>
> Which achieves the same ends.  In particular, foo() is not
> called unless logging occurs.

Hmmm...sorry, I didn't quite see that until I took a real hard look at
the macro...

Cheers,

Richard

The content of this e-mail is intended only for the confidential use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not such a person, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that reading it, copying it, or in any way disseminating its content to any other person, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying to the e-mail immediately. NeoNet AB and its subsidiaries (NeoNet Securities AB, NeoNet Securities Inc. and NeoNet Technology AB) are unable to exercise control over the content of information contained in transmissions made via the Internet and hereby excludes any warranty as to the quality or accuracy of any information contained in this message and any liability of any kind for the information contained in it, or for its transmission, reception, storage or use in any way whatsoever.