|
Boost : |
From: Eugene Alterman (eugalt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-17 01:55:41
"Eugene Alterman" <eugalt_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:dnv3c8$eo2$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> I just want to point out (hopefully without getting off topic too much)
> that there is an important difference between what you mean by
> 'synchronous' and the way this term is usually used in this context (and
> in particular in the publication you are mentioning).
>
> By 'synchronous' you seem to mean *blocking* synchronous i/o while in
> those patterns it is understood as synchronous i/o event demultiplexing
> and handling, meaning that a synchronous i/o operation is issued only if
> there is a ready event and the operation would not block.
This is not accurate of course :(
Please disregard the whole thing - I just got carried away. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk