Boost logo

Boost :

From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-20 11:27:37

"Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> wrote

> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> > Rene Rivera wrote:
> >> For the HP TestDrive toolset it would be
> >> "<tru64cxx71-006><*><build>no". If you need to do some more
> >> complicated matching logic to determine when to add the no-build
> >> option you'll need to use a requirement rule. See the serialization
> >> test Jamfiles for an example.
> > Is this still a problem? Should I disable the typeof tests for this
> > tool?
> Not a problem anymore. Have a look at the typeof test Jamfile and you'll
> note that I have helped myself. I hope you don't mind.

Fine for now, but I think "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml",
<mark-unusable> is a better place for this...


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at