|
Boost : |
From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-20 11:27:37
"Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>
> > Rene Rivera wrote:
>
> >> For the HP TestDrive toolset it would be
> >> "<tru64cxx71-006><*><build>no". If you need to do some more
> >> complicated matching logic to determine when to add the no-build
> >> option you'll need to use a requirement rule. See the serialization
> >> test Jamfiles for an example.
>
> > Is this still a problem? Should I disable the typeof tests for this
> > tool?
>
>
> Not a problem anymore. Have a look at the typeof test Jamfile and you'll
> note that I have helped myself. I hope you don't mind.
Fine for now, but I think "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml",
<mark-unusable> is a better place for this...
Arkadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk