From: Richard Glanmark (Richard.Glanmark_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-21 03:15:39
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Caleb Epstein
> Sent: den 20 december 2005 19:11
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Logging: formal review
> On 12/20/05, nitin motgi <nitin.motgi_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Question:
> > Should the logger concept be able support multi-threaded
> > logging.
> Definitely. What might be a better question however is
> should the logger be thread aware by default?
There is probably projects with time constraints who want to optimize
for everything, so I think that it should be possible to have
loggers/sinks/etc without synhronization in them.
But personally, I wouldn't mind if it was aware by default.
The content of this e-mail is intended only for the confidential use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not such a person, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that reading it, copying it, or in any way disseminating its content to any other person, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying to the e-mail immediately. NeoNet AB and its subsidiaries (NeoNet Securities AB, NeoNet Securities Inc. and NeoNet Technology AB) are unable to exercise control over the content of information contained in transmissions made via the Internet and hereby excludes any warranty as to the quality or accuracy of any information contained in this message and any liability of any kind for the information contained in it, or for its transmission, reception, storage or use in any way whatsoever.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk