From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-21 04:15:57
Frank Laub wrote:
>> Is there a particular reason why this compiler complains about the
>> conversion whereas the others are fine with it? Would you consider making
>> this change to support this compiler?
> I'm happy to make a change that supports more compilers. Thanks for trying
> it out on Borland. I'll have an update soon.
Actually, this is not about supporting more compilers - this about
fixing a bug. Putting 'return false' there is a bug, plain and simple,
and 'return optional()' is the right thing to do, whether we care about
more compilers support or not...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk