Re: [boost] BOSOT_ENUM proposal rev 4

From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-21 04:15:57

Frank Laub wrote:
>> Is there a particular reason why this compiler complains about the
>> conversion whereas the others are fine with it?  Would you consider making
>> this change to support this compiler?
> 
> I'm happy to make a change that supports more compilers. Thanks for trying
> it out on Borland. I'll have an update soon.

Actually, this is not about supporting more compilers - this about 
fixing a bug. Putting 'return false' there is a bug, plain and simple, 
and 'return optional()' is the right thing to do, whether we care about 
more compilers support or not...