Re: [boost] BOSOT_ENUM proposal rev 4

From: Frank Laub (frank.laub_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-22 04:30:19

>
> No, it won't. typename should be replaced by BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME,
> which expands to typename on compilers that require it, and nothing
> where they reject it.

Ya know, my first implementation used this macro, however I noticed other
boost libs that did not use it, so I mistakenly thought it was deprecated.
Silly me :)

-Frank