Re: [boost] BOSOT_ENUM proposal rev 4

From: Richard Jennings (richard.jennings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-22 05:16:05

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:28:15 -0000, Frank Laub <frank.laub_at_[hidden]>  
wrote:
[snip]
> Changing bitfield_base as follows:
>> void operator |= (const bitfield_base<T>& rhs)
>> {
>>    m_value |= rhs.m_value;
>> }
>
>
> If I make the return value be void, the Boost.Operators library goes  
> nuts. I
> can change the rhs type I suppose, that shouldn't hurt anything. I  
> realize I
> am returning a derived type, but it should be ok because the derived type
> doesn't have any memory associated with it; all data is in the base.
>
> -Frank

The return type is void in rev4.3 isn't it?  I have not changed the return
type, only the parameter type?  (At least that was my intent)