|
|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-07 17:59:07
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> OTOH, it looks like all the workarounds just define _additional_ overloads.
> So what if we add a separate header for every "broken" compiler? Such
> headers would have all the additional overloads, possibly #ifdeffed by the
> compiler version, and #included during configuration?
Looks fine to me.
-- Alexander Nasonov
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk