Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-09 04:00:38

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:dpsa4b$in6$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> I'm gettng pestered by the automatic regression test failure notification 
> system about Boost.Filesystem with GCC 2.95.3.
>
> Does anyone still care?
>
> I could just mark all the failures as expected,  but if no one cares 
> anymore then we ought to stop testing 2.95.3, free up the testing 
> resources and stop pestering Boost developers about 2.95.3 failures.
>
> --Beman

I support this. Pre 3.0.0 release is a cause for huge number of workarounds. 
Specifically related to classic IO and weak templates support. Lets get rid 
of these.

Gennadiy