From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-09 05:45:28
On Monday 09 January 2006 12:59, Martin Wille wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Not that I care about 2.95 either, but I think the reasoning in this
> > thread is a bit faulty. Developers just say "it's too old and
> > non-conforming". But who knows what's used in practice, especially
> > outside of bleeding-edge Linux distros?
> Even conservative distributions like Debian use gcc 3 now.
We don't know which ports of gcc are there in the wild.
> If a Linux (or any other OS) distribution still uses gcc 2 then it is
> unlikely the distribution wants to support modern versions of Boost,
> anyway (if it supports Boost at all).
It's still better to notify users, IMO. If nobody cares, then no discussion is
needed at all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk