|
|
Boost : |
From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-09 09:48:30
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
| Sent: 09 January 2006 13:18
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?
| > Maybe, the procedure for retiring compilers should
| including posting
| > a message with prominent subject to boost-users and waiting for a
| > couple of weeks for feedback?
May I suggest an announcement at each release of Boost of 'things to become
no longer supported in the next release'? This might include Boost code
that has gone beyond the 'deprecated' state (which might longer), as well as
support for platforms, compilers etc.
This would give people a bit more time to adjust their plans.
Paul
-- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB Phone and SMS text +44 1539 561830, Mobile and SMS text +44 7714 330204 mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden] http://www.hetp.u-net.com/index.html http://www.hetp.u-net.com/Paul%20A%20Bristow%20info.html
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk