From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-16 17:44:46
"AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The following lines are found at the end of
> boost/iterator/detail/config_def.h :
> #if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__GNUC__, == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 95) \
> || BOOST_WORKAROUND(__MWERKS__, <= 0x2407) \
> || BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(0x551))
> # define BOOST_ITERATOR_NO_MPL_AUX_HAS_XXX // "MPL's has_xxx facility
> doesn't work"
> However, I can't find any code using this define -
> Would it make sense to remove the workaround?
Sounds right. If you have commit privileges, feel free.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk