Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest

From: Alec Ross (alec_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-21 04:29:52

In message <154ba197a9.197a9154ba_at_[hidden]>, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z 
<joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes
>
>
>----- Mensaje original -----
>De: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 11:17 pm
>Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for
>interest
>
>> "JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>[...]
>> >
>> > position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing:
>> > in the roadmapped ranked indices
>> >
>> >
>>
>(http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices)
>>
>> > I will need another member function to return the
>> > position ordinal of a given element (that is,
>> > the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position"
>> > seems also a good candidate.
>>
>> IMO that should have been "index."
>>
>
>But "index" already has a disparate meaning in the
>context of Boost.MultiIndex. I need another synonim:
>ordinal, rank, situation?
>
"Inverse", "domain_index"?

-- 
Alec Ross