Boost logo

Boost :

From: Zara (yozara_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-21 09:56:01


On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:24:42 +0100, Tobias Schwinger
<tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>AlisdairM wrote:
>> I am far from a preprocessor expert though, and wonder what other tests
>> I should look at before pushing this update?
>
>Well, I would not call myself an expert either and I don't know if this post
>should affect your update plans.
>Anyway: since you seem to have that new compiler installed I would find it
>interesting to know whether the "tuple testers" in the detail directory of
>Boost.Preprocessor work as expected now (they did not work with older versions of
>the Borland preprocessor):
>
> #include <boost/preprocessor/detail/is_nullary.hpp>
> #include <boost/preprocessor/detail/is_unary.hpp>
> #include <boost/preprocessor/detail/is_binary.hpp>
>
> BOOST_PP_IS_NULLARY(foo) // should expand to 0
> BOOST_PP_IS_UNARY(foo) // should expand to 0
> BOOST_PP_IS_BINARY(foo) // should expand to 0
>
> BOOST_PP_IS_NULLARY(()) // should expand to 1
> BOOST_PP_IS_UNARY((foo)) // should expand to 1
> BOOST_PP_IS_BINARY((foo,bar)) // should expand to 1
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Tobias
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

After some adjusting of boost/config/borland.hpp, and adding the
suggested test, these are the results of config_info nullary,unary and
binary results at the end):

#Unknown ISO C++ Compiler
# __BORLANDC__ =0x0581
# __CDECL__ =1
# __CONSOLE__ =1
# _CPPUNWIND =1
# __cplusplus =1
# __FLAT__ =1
# __FUNC__ ="print_compiler_macros"
# _M_IX86 =500
# __TLS__ =1
# _WCHAR_T [no value]
# _Windows =1
# __WIN32__ =1
# _WIN32 =1
# _RTLDLL [no value]
# _WCHAR_T_DEFINED [no value]
# _DLL =1
# __i386__ =1
# _WCHAR_T [no value]
# __STDC_HOSTED__ =1
#
#
#*********************************************************************
#
#Dinkumware standard library version 402
# _CPPLIB_VER =402
# _HAS_EXCEPTIONS =1
#
#
#*********************************************************************
#
#Detected Platform: Win32
# Type char is signed
# Type wchar_t is unsigned
# byte order for type short =0 8
# byte order for type int =0 8 16 24
# byte order for type long =0 8 16 24
# sizeof(wchar_t) =2
# sizeof(short) =2
# sizeof(int) =4
# sizeof(long) =4
# sizeof(size_t) =4
# sizeof(ptrdiff_t) =4
# sizeof(void*) =4
# sizeof(void(*)(void)) =4
# sizeof(float) =4
# sizeof(double) =8
# sizeof(long double) =10
# CHAR_BIT =8
# CHAR_MAX =127
# WCHAR_MAX =0x7fff
# SHRT_MAX =32767
# INT_MAX =2147483647L
# LONG_MAX =2147483647L
# __STDC_IEC_559__ =1
# __STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__ =1
# __STDC_ISO_10646__ =200009L
#
#
#*********************************************************************
#
#Boost version 103301
# BOOST_USER_CONFIG =<boost/config/user.hpp>
# BOOST_COMPILER_CONFIG ="boost/config/compiler/borland.hpp"
# BOOST_STDLIB_CONFIG ="boost/config/stdlib/dinkumware.hpp"
# BOOST_PLATFORM_CONFIG ="boost/config/platform/win32.hpp"
# BOOST_BCB_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION_BUG [no value]
# BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME =typename
# BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL [no value]
# BOOST_HAS_DECLSPEC [no value]
# BOOST_HAS_FTIME [no value]
# BOOST_HAS_PARTIAL_STD_ALLOCATOR [no value]
# BOOST_MSVC6_MEMBER_TEMPLATES [no value]
# BOOST_NESTED_TEMPLATE =template
# BOOST_NO_DEPENDENT_NESTED_DERIVATIONS [no value]
# BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING [no value]
# BOOST_NO_HASH [no value]
# BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T [no value]
# BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT [no value]
# BOOST_NO_LONG_LONG_NUMERIC_LIMITS [no value]
# BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS [no value]
# BOOST_NO_MS_INT64_NUMERIC_LIMITS [no value]
# BOOST_NO_PRIVATE_IN_AGGREGATE [no value]
# BOOST_NO_SFINAE [no value]
# BOOST_NO_SLIST [no value]
# BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF [no value]
# BOOST_NO_USING_TEMPLATE [no value]
# BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE =std
# BOOST_UNREACHABLE_RETURN(0) [no value]
#
#nullary(foo):0
#unary(foo):0
#binary(foo):0
#nullary(()):1
#unary((foo)):1
#binary((foo,bar)):1

If I do understand it right, Borland has cirrectedthe preprocessor

Best regads,

Zara


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk