Re: [boost] New Borland compiler has a conforming preprocessor?

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-21 10:52:50

Sebastian Redl wrote:

> This sounds like a contradiction. If wchar_t is unsigned, then the
> max value should be 0x7ffff.

It appears wchar_t is defined to only use the first 15 bits on this
compiler (assuming you intended to write 0xffff) as the min value is
zero, not a big negative.

This was the case with BCB6 too, I don't have copy of BCB5 to hand but
guess it has always been the case on this platform.

-- 
AlisdairM