Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-21 10:55:09

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "[boost] Boost regression notification (2006-01-21 [HEAD])"
Previous message: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [typeof-users] Looking for a consistent scheme for adding Typeof support to Boost libraries"
In reply to: AlisdairM: "Re: [boost] New Borland compiler has a conforming preprocessor?"
Next in thread: Paul Mensonides: "Re: [boost] New Borland compiler has a conforming preprocessor?"

AlisdairM wrote:

> AFAICT this is correct now, with the BOOST_PP_CONFIG_STRICT() setting.

Further testing shows:
BCB6 passes all tests in preprocessor library with 'strict' config too.
BCB6 fails your additional test, with and without 'strict' config.

BCB2006 passes your additional test.

It looks like we could do with an extra test in the suite?

-- 
AlisdiarM

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "[boost] Boost regression notification (2006-01-21 [HEAD])"
Previous message: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [typeof-users] Looking for a consistent scheme for adding Typeof support to Boost libraries"
In reply to: AlisdairM: "Re: [boost] New Borland compiler has a conforming preprocessor?"
Next in thread: Paul Mensonides: "Re: [boost] New Borland compiler has a conforming preprocessor?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk