From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-26 09:33:35
Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
> AlisdairM wrote:
>> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> At the least, I think the build maintainers and regression testers need
>> to make a decision on this fast if we are heading back into release
>> Will Boost 1.34 be based on boost build v1 or boost build v2?
> If v2 is up and running in two weeks it can make it in. My personal
> opinion is that this is a recipe for disaster. I would like to push it
> to 1.35.
Have you seen Vladimir's plan for the transition? It's solid. I
think if we can accomplish all the necessary testing of the system
within the two week timeframe, the risk of using v2 for the release
will be very low.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk