|
Boost : |
From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-26 13:49:55
"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
> REGISTER_SPEC((typename T),
> (std::set< T )( std::less<T> )( std::allocator<T> > ))
>
> REGISTER_SPEC((typename T)(typename Pred),
> (std::set< T )( Pred )( std::allocator<T> > ))
>
> // ^^^ NOTE: not a proposal for an interface -- for illustration,
only
Also, please note that currently, when (class) or (typename) is passed to
the macro, it's not just used as is. Instead, it is used to create an
"object" that contains certain knowledge of how the type template parameter
is different from integral template parameter and template template
parameter. So it doesn't seem possible to just replace it with (typename
T). We would probably have to pass them separately: (typename)(T).
Regards,
Arkadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk