Re: [boost] Typeof registration of partially specialized templates

From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-27 09:51:58

"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote

> That's not exactly what I meant. It's possible to
>
>    #define REG_SPEC(a,b) \
>       ... struct my_traits< a_private_return_type b > { ... }

Do you mean:
    ... struct my_traits< a_private_return_type(b) > { ... }
?

> And then use "my_traits< a_private_return_type(T) >".

> However, we can't apply this technique globally because not all types are
valid function parameter types (this is what I meant with "extra work" in
the sentence below).

Which types are not valid?  void?

> > I also switched to 80 (was 50) -- let's see if it works...
> >
> Obviously not so really. As another experiment I told my client not to
break lines at all (if my posts remain readable it should be a solution).

I don't have such option.  Trying maximum (132).

Regards,
Arkadiy